So here are the respondents who cheated. I laugh! As I mentioned before, this is a complicated question with no real right or wrong answer. These experts discussed the merits of relevance and authority as parameters, explaining how the choice of one over the other may depend on the specific situation or context. Generally authoritative, but depends on the situation These experts explained that they lean towards authority in general, but noted situations where they would look for a more relevant low authority link. “
Relevance is a fairly subjective term. For example, a New York Times link may not be considered very relevant (because the site covers so many topics), but I'd like to get that link. So in this situation, I would lean towards authority. But, if the relevance jewelry retouching service gap is large — like getting a link from a high authority site where neither the page nor the site is relevant to my site — I'd probably lean toward higher relevance. Not a single answer to your question, because there are many nuances! - Eric Enge, Stone Temple Consulting “At the end of the day, I would appreciate (as a general statement) authority on relevance. "
Why? A high authority site tends to have a much wider 'relevance umbrella' anyway, but the value is (or should be) obvious and immediate to anyone with SEO experience, regardless of which is the number of topics covered by the different categories of a site.. Relevance also takes care of itself a bit, because as a best practice you shouldn't approach a site like this - site of high authority, with broad categories - with no specific intent. This means that you know what types of topics and tone are appropriate and the editor or webmaster